Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Unit Outcomes: Differentiate between various software development methodologies.

Unit Outcomes:
Differentiate between various software development methodologies.
Select an appropriate methodology for a particular software development project.
Examine software design and modeling techniques.
Apply software design tools.
Course Outcomes practiced in this unit:
IT232-1: Implement various software process models.
GEL-8.03: Apply critical thinking to formulate a logical solution to a problem.
Purpose
Given a requirement, you will examine various software design and modeling techniques by diagramming and analyzing a solution. You will create an IPO chart, pseudo-code, flowchart diagram and perform a desk-check analysis to help formulate your solution to the problem posed.
Assignment Instructions
Note: For this assignment, you will not be writing any actual code. You are just going through the design and modeling of this scenario.
Using an IPO chart, a flowchart diagram, and pseudocode, you will design a routine that will accept a Fahrenheit temperature and convert that temperature to its Celsius and Kelvin equivalents. Hint: The term routine can mean function, subroutine, procedure, etc., depending on the language in question.
Assignment Requirements
A user enters in a Fahrenheit temperature, and gets back two values:
Celsius temperature
Kelvin temperature 
The code routine will accept one argument, tempFahrenheit and will calculate two values, tempCelsius and tempKelvin.
It will call two routines internally:
ConvertFahrenheitToCelsius will be a routine to convert a Fahrenheit temperature to Celsius
ConvertFahrenheitToKelvin will be a routine to convert a Fahrenheit temperature to Kelvin.
Use these variable and routine names in your solution.
Research and find the formulas to convert Fahrenheit temperature to Celsius and Kelvin and then apply critical thinking skills to formulate a logical programmatic solution to convert the user-entered value of Fahrenheit temperature to Celsius and Kelvin equivalents.
Then design the two routines that will implement the formulas you found in your research.
We do this by examining how the routines should behave and walk ourselves through the design using the following tools.
Create your IPO chart. This is where you determine your inputs-processes-outputs.
Create a flowchart diagram showing the flow of logic for the solution to these problems.
Create your pseudo-code. Hint: Pseudocode is a mix of simple syntax from real programming languages and English. When modeling your full routine or program you will show every aspect of it in the pseudocode. In the case of adding your algorithms or processing to IPO charts or flowcharts, you can use snippets of the pseudocode to only show the pertinent processing.
How can you prove that your algorithm is correct?
You will perform an experiment and then analyze your results to determine if your algorithm is correct.
We must follow the scientific method to ensure repeatable results in our experiment. First, we determine a hypothesis:
“What value is computed for an input of 3”? 
We note the expected result from our hypothesis. It will later be compared to the actual results from our experiment to determine if the experiment passed or failed.
The process we use to perform our experiment is called a desk check.
A desk check is when you identify all the variables used in the routine and place them in a table.
You then examine a potential input value, step through the code, and fill out the table at each step in the code. So, when a variable in your code has its value changed, be sure to update that new value in your desk checking table. At the end of the table you will have calculated your actual result.
This investigation will identify if you have designed the correct logic to realize a correct result.
The actual result should match the expected result. You must desk check each routine at least three times. 
After you have completed your experiment, you need to analyze your results. Did you prove or disprove your hypothesis?
Discuss the results of your experiment in a Word document. Show your analysis and your data then explain your conclusions.
EXAMPLE:
Here is an example scenario using the square algorithm. The square routine will take a number in as a parameter, perform calculations to determine the square of the number and return the result. You will examine the routine and determine the variables of interest. Then experiment with different input values as you build your desk check tables.
Sample Desk Check: Using your pseudo-code algorithm. This routine has three variables of interest:
num – the input parameter
i – the value of the counter
Value – the result of the calculation
Our hypothesis will be:
If you call the square routine with an input number, the calculated result returned by the square routine will be that number squared. The input value times itself (number X number).
Hypothesis: If you call the square routine with an input of 3, the calculated result should be 9. Experiment: Desk check using 3 as input parameter 
Expected Result: square(3) = 9
i
num
value
0
3
3
1
3
6
2
3

Actual Result: 9
Hypothesis: If you call the square routine with an input of 7, the calculated result should be 49.
Experiment: Desk check using 7 as input parameter
Expected Result: square(7) = 49
i
num
value
0
7
7
1
7
14
2
7
21
3
7
28
4
7
35
5
7
42
6
7
49
Actual Result: 49
Directions for Submitting Your Assignment
Submit one document that contains your IPO chart, flowchart, pseudocode and analysis, and conclusions.
Name your Assignment document according to this convention: The file should be saved as IT232_YourLastName_Unit1. Submit your completed assignment to the Dropbox by the deadline.
Review the rubric before beginning this activity.

The post Unit Outcomes:
Differentiate between various software development methodologies. appeared first on essaynook.com.

Scroll to Top