Read the ethical discussion on Page 243 of the Murray, Pope, and Willis (2017) text. Answer the following questions: Would you honor Alexander’s request? What ethical principles (beneficence, nonmaleficence, fidelity, etc.) are relevant in this case? What are the benefits of not telling Andrew? What are the potential problems? What would you like to tell your clients in informaed consent about how you will handle “secrets?’ Responsive Post: Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings. Respond to three of your colleagues who chose different points to address. Expand on your colleague’s posting and counseling strategies that might be helpful when working with Candace. Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made. Use examples to support your ideas. Be sure to cite your points using the learning resources. You may also use other scholarly literature to support your discussion. Citations and references must be in APA format. See the grading rubric for more information. Peer Response: In order to meet minimum requirements, respond to at least 3 peers on 3 different days with substantive responses and support these responses with references.
