Read Steven Keen’s 2020 article “The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change”. Respond to the following questions using up to 400 words total: 1) What are the three neoclassical approaches used to estimate the economic damage resulting from climate change that Keen criticizes? These can be found in the Abstract. 2) What are Keen’s main objections to each of those three approaches? 3) What is the problem with Peer Review that Keen identifies in the section titled, “Simplifying assumptions and the refereeing process: the poachers become the gatekeepers” and how has it become apparent in the case of neoclassical economics and climate change
