Presentation Style Introduces ethical issues in the selected journal article that clearly states points of the discussion. Provides the title of the article selected, name of author(s), date of publication is from a peer-reviewed journal. (5 points) Is missing one of the three main components of an introduction. Ethical dilemma inferred (3 points) Is missing two or three of the components of an introduction. Ethical dilemma not clearly identified. (1 point) _________/ 5 Audience Engagement Verbal -Volume & pace suitable to audience & content; pitch, tone and volume vary. Non-verbal eye contact; facial, hand gestures are appropriate. Responds appropriately to audience feedback. Encourages and handles audience participation constructively. (5 points) Verbal -Volume & pace suitable to audience & content; pitch, tone and volume vary. Non-verbal eye contact; facial, hand gestures were slightly distracting. Responds to audience feedback. Minimally encourages and handles audience participation. ( 3 points) Verbal -Volume & pace not suitable to audience & content; pitch, tone and volume vary. Non-verbal eye contact; facial, hand gestures were distracting. Responds inappropriately to audience feedback. Did not encourage or handle audience participation. (0 points) ________/ 5 Critical thinking and analysis are evident. The article selected indicates a legal and ethical issue in nursing in the title of the article. The articles addresses pertinent topics such as: Professional nursing practice, malpractice, bioethics, informed consent, confidentiality laws, end of life, abortion, stem cell research, spirituality, transgender, organ donations, fraternization, Medicare/insurance fraud, mandated reporting (abuse), cultural sensitivity/humility, and impaired healthcare providers. Evidence of critical thinking, synthesis and analysis throughout the presentation (10 points) Article is appropriate; however the presentation lacks critical thinking, synthesis and analysis that demonstrate an ethical/legal issue in nursing. (5 point) Article is inappropriate provides little or no evidence of critical thinking, synthesis
