· NU674-7B
· Unit 14 Assignment – Clinical: Journal Reflection
Immersive Reader
Unit 14 Assignment – Clinical: Journal Reflection
Reflective Journal Instructions
You will create 7 entries for your Reflective Journal about a patient encounter. In the 7th entry, you will review the previous 6 entries and evaluate your progress in reflective practice over the course of the term. Each journal should be a minimum of 250 words.
The purpose of this reflective journal is self-reflection regarding the role in the process of self-reflection as a PMHNP provider. Through reflective practice, the student will evaluate their own emotional health and recognize one’s own feelings as well as one’s ability to monitor and manage those feelings. The point of the exercise is to learn yourself, your triggers, the types of cases you end up getting overly involved with, and those you’d rather refer to someone else. The idea is to be able to personally reflect on your behaviors/thoughts/decisions and how those impact you in the role of PMHNP.
Address the following items:
The principles of nursing such as Autonomy, Beneficence, Fidelity, Informed consent, Integrity, Justice, Nonmaleficence, Paternalism, Veracity, as well as Privacy, and Confidentiality describe what constitutes safe and effective nursing care, and cover the aspects of behavior, attitude, and approach that underpin good care.
· Discuss a patient interaction in which the principle of Privacy and confidentiality was breached, and why?
· What did you learn from this and how important is this principle in providing nursing care?
Rubric
NU674 Unit 14 Assignment – Clinical: Journal Reflection
NU674 Unit 14 Assignment – Clinical: Journal Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomeContent Reflection
10 pts
Level
5
Reflection
demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and
evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media,
discussions activities, and/or assignments. Insightful and relevant
connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.
7 pts
Level
3
Reflection
demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing,
and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures,
media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Connections made through
explanations, inferences, and/or examples.
4 pts
Level
1
Reflection
demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or
evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media,
discussions, activities, and/or assignments Minimal connections made
through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.
0 pts
Level
0
Reflection
lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course
concepts and course materials, activities, and/or assignments.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomePersonal Growth
10 pts
Level
5
Conveys
strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the
self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates significant personal growth
and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well
developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges.
Synthesizes current experience into future implications.
7 pts
Level
3
Conveys
evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the
self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth
and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and
challenges. Some thought of the future implications of current experience.
4 pts
Level
1
Conveys
limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the
self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates less than adequate personal
growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples,
insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of
the future implications of current experience.
0 pts
Level
0
Conveys
inadequate evidence of reflection on own work in response to the
self-assessment questions posed. Personal growth and awareness are not
evident and/or demonstrates a neutral experience with negligible personal
impact. Lacks enough inferences, examples, personal insights and
challenges, and/or future implications are overlooked.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomeTimliness
5 pts
Level
5
Journal
reflection is submitted on or before deadline.
3.5 pts
Level
3
Journal
reflection is submitted within 1 day (24 hours) after the deadline.
2 pts
Leve
1
Journal
reflection is submitted 1-2 days (25-48 hours) after the deadline.
0 pts
Level
0
Journal
reflection is submitted 2-3 days (49-72 hours) after the deadline.
5 pts
Total Points: 25