Instructions
This assignment supports the following objective:
· Analyze the issues related to disparities in healthcare.
In this unit you have learned about the many issues people in the U.S. face regarding the accessibility of healthcare services. Health care reform efforts are attempting to remedy some of these access issues, but we still are seeing many groups of people, whether in relation to socio-economic status, age, or the patient’s geographic location, that are still running into barriers when attempting to find health care.
Scenario:
As a health care management professional, you have been asked to speak to a local Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) program. Your presentation is titled “Equity and access to health care in the U.S.”
For this assignment, prepare a presentation to include the following:
Address three topics relevant to “Equity and access to healthcare in the U.S.” with applicable sub-points for each topic, Structure your presentation using the following format:
· Introduction
· Content Slide 1 – Topic A
· Content Slide 2 – Topic A
· Content Slide 3 – Topic B
· Content Slide 4 – Topic B
· Content Slide 5 – Topic C
· Content Slide 6 – Topic C
· Conclusion
Create a presentation using PowerPoint
Include speaker’s notes with PowerPoint
Target Audience: CNA students who have basic health care knowledge and experience. These individuals will be interacting with a wide variety of patient populations and health care systems upon graduation.
APA requirements: Title and reference slides, three scholarly sources, in-text citations and APA formatting throughout.
HC401 Unit 1 Assignment – Equity and Access to Healthcare
|
HC401 Unit 1 Assignment – Equity
and Access to Healthcare
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
|
25 pts
5
Three relevant topics are presented comprehensively, with appropriate
key points and takeaways.
|
22.5 pts
4
Three relevant topics are presented, with appropriate key points and
takeaways.
|
20 pts
3
Three topics are presented accurately, with some irrelevant or redundant
content included. Appropriate key points and takeaways are included.
|
16.25 pts
2
At least two topics are presented, with some irrelevant, redundant,
or inaccurate content included. Some relevant key points and takeaways are
included.
|
7.5 pts
1
At least one topic is presented, with some irrelevant, redundant, or
inaccurate content included. There is minimal evidence of key points or
takeaways for the audience.
|
0 pts
0
Presentation content does not relate to the assignment details.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
PRICE-P
|
|
25 pts
5
Analysis reflects scholarly research and full comprehension of course
concepts.
|
22.5 pts
4
Analysis reflects research and full comprehension of course concepts.
|
20 pts
3
Analysis reflects some research AND/OR comprehension of course
concepts.
|
16.25 pts
2
There is minimal evidence of research. Course concepts are correctly
applied.
|
7.5 pts
1
Analysis is supported only by personal experience, with some
irrelevance.
|
0 pts
0
There is no evidence of any research or application of course
concepts.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction &
Conclusion
|
|
15 pts
5
Introduction and conclusion slides are clear, concise and provide
added-value to the presentation.
|
13.5 pts
4
Introduction and conclusion slides are clear and relevant to the
presentation.
|
12 pts
3
Introduction and conclusion slides are included but are too general
to deliver added-value to the presentation.
|
9.75 pts
2
Only an introduction OR a conclusion slide is included. Information
provided is appropriate.
|
4.5 pts
1
Only an introduction OR a conclusion slide is included. Information
is irrelevant, too vague, or is inaccurate.
|
0 pts
0
Introduction and conclusion slides are not included in the presentation.
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDelivery &
Audience
|
|
10 pts
5
Speaker’s notes, a transcript, or a clear voice-over is included and
adds value to the presentation. Appropriate audience is addressed.
|
9 pts
4
Speaker’s notes, a transcript, or a clear voice-over is included.
Appropriate audience is addressed.
|
8 pts
3
Partial speaker’s notes, a transcript, or a voice-over is included.
Appropriate audience is addressed.
|
6.5 pts
2
Speaker’s notes, a transcript, or a voice-over is included.
Appropriate audience is not addressed.
|
3 pts
1
Partial speaker’s notes, a transcript, or a voice-over is included.
Appropriate audience is not addressed.
|
0 pts
0
No speaker’s notes, transcript, or a clear voice-over is included.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlide Design
|
|
5 pts
5
Slide design is clean, clear, and professional.
|
4.5 pts
4
Slide design is mostly clean, clear, and professional.
|
4 pts
3
Slide design includes some distracting elements. Font sizes or images
detract from a professional appearance.
|
3.25 pts
2
Slide design includes several distracting elements. Font sizes, slide
layout, and/or images detract from a professional appearance.
|
1.5 pts
1
Slide design is unprofessional, not suitable for delivery to an
audience of professional colleagues.
|
0 pts
0
Presentation format is not used.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
|
|
10 pts
5
The presentation exhibits an excellent command of written English
language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, grammar,
or spelling.
|
9 pts
4
The presentation exhibits a good command of written English language
conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and
minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.
|
8 pts
3
The presentation exhibits an acceptable command of written English
language conventions. The presentation has minor errors in mechanics,
grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
|
6.5 pts
2
The presentation exhibits a limited command of written English
language conventions. The presentation has frequent errors in mechanics,
grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
|
3 pts
1
The presentation exhibits little command of written English language
conventions. The presentation has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling
that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern
meaning.
|
0 pts
0
The presentation does not demonstrate command of written English
language conventions. The presentation has multiple errors in mechanics,
grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the
meaning.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
|
|
10 pts
5
Title and reference slides are included with correct formatting.
Three references are provided.
|
9 pts
4
Title and reference slides are included with minor formatting errors.
Three references are provided.
|
8 pts
3
Title and reference slides are included with minor formatting errors.
At least one reference is provided.
|
6.5 pts
2
Title slide is missing. At least one reference is provided.
|
3 pts
1
Title slide is included. No references are provided.
|
0 pts
0
Title and reference slides are missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
